The Master of Delft (fl c. 1490–1520) was a Dutch painter of the truth period of Early Netherlandish painting, whose state is unknown. He may have been born on the order of 1470. The notname was first used in 1913 by Max Jakob Friedländer, in describing the wings of a Triptych bearing in mind the Virgin and Child like St Anne with the central panel by the Master of Frankfurt, which is now in Aachen. This has donor portraits of an identifiable intimates from Delft, that of the Burgomaster of Delft, Dirck Dircksz van Beest Heemskerck (1463–1545), with his wife and children.
He can furthermore be joined to Delft by the engagement of the Nieuwe Kerk tower, which was completed in 1496, in the background of his Scenes from the Passion of Christ triptych in the National Gallery, London, generally definitely to be his masterpiece, and the “most representative and best preserved triptych in the group” attributed to him. This can be obsolescent fairly precisely to 1509 as none of the prints it borrows details from are dated sophisticated than that. The monastic donor kneeling at the left of the middle panel may be Herman van Rossum, provost of the Koningsveld convent just outdoor the city. There is a larger, related, triptych in a Cologne private collection.
As Walter Liedtke describes the triptychs, “homely, everyday, types, including a variety of low-life characters, cover most of the surface in jagged rhythms”, and (it might be added) very fanciful and extravagant costume in many cases. He is a good borrower of details from prints, especially those by Lucas van Leyden, and possibly worked as a printmaker himself, probably in woodcut. Friedländer suggested he had illustrated a compilation published in 1498.
Delft was apparently more notable as a centre for miniatures for illuminated manuscripts in this epoch than for panel painting; there were many monasteries as capably as churches in the city, which even though small, was rich from textiles and brewing beer. The master’s style can be compared to that of the Master of the Virgo inter Virgines, who was the additional leading painter alert in Delft in the similar period. The careers of both are made harder to comprehend as an unusually tall proportion of both local paintings and documents have been destroyed in a series of disasters: a large ember in 1536, the Beeldenstorm of 1566, or new Protestant destruction of images. The great Delft Explosion of 1654 no doubt destroyed more. There was as a consequence a tendency for the largest church commissions to be unmovable to artists in the larger artistic centres to the south.
What do you think of the works of Master of Delft?
Use the form below to say your opinion about Master of Delft. All opinions are welcome!